I'm gonna update my xanga. So here you go thousands of people who read my blog because it's so important you can't help yourself. If you want fantastic movie advice read further, brave soldier. Here are some recent movies I have seen and my extraordinarily fantastic and important reviews of them: Rachel Getting Married: Alright, this is an indie movie through and through. They even used the less glamorous camera/has the look of a camcorder esque look to it. And let's face it people anything other than that exact type of camera would have failed this movie! The mark of a true good movie is when it makes us feel a way we wouldn't in real life. Rachel Getting Married accomplishes this. Can you honestly say that in real life you'd feel bad for a chick addicted to drugs her whole life responsible for killing her little brother? No, liar, you would not. And no that's not a spoiler. You find this out quickly so don't cuss at me through the computer screen. But that's exactly what happens. Warning: tears will ensue. So don't go watch it with someone you feel the need to be a badass around, because you'll look like a little girl. Five stars my friends. A definite must check out. It's like an indie movie that can appeal to people who fail to see the awesomeness of indie movies. The Lucky Ones: Don't let the title fool you. It's not as cheesy as it sounds. It's about 3 army vets...two who are on medical leave for 30 days and one who is out for good...who have a chance encounter on the plane ride home and when they arrive in New York they must share the last rental car available and drive cross country. It has very very little to do with the war...in fact the word Iraq isn't said once in this movie...and it has everything to do with the journey. Actors? For you Notebook fans it has Rachel McAdams. For you Crash fans it has Michael Pena. For you Shawshank Redemption fans it has Tim Robbins. Predictable? Fairly. Overwhelmingly happy ending? No. Good, solid movie? Yes. This movie has its moments and unless you're a movie prude you should check it out. And by movie prude I mean if you must absolutely dissect every movie to the point that the only ones you can find enjoyable at all are movies that end up on AFI's list of 100 great movies or whatever and just will not accept that any movie that is not on this list is not complete rubbish and is not necessarily not worth watching. My guess is that none of you are like this and are instead people who find movies like Ferris Bueller's Day Off a classic, can't resist the sappy yet endearing moments of The Notebook, enjoy Harry Potter for reasons you can't explain, and will never be able to resist the charm of The Lion King, even when you're 40. If this is you, then you will probably like this movie. Miracle At St. Anna: This movie meets the just barely okay mark. Here's what is wrong with this movie: there's almost no part in the entire movie where music is not playing. I would really like to know what in the world the editor was thinking allowing the music editor to cover each shot with music. I mean, so many moments could have been so effective if there was just silence but no, there's music there. And it's not music that fits the scene either. We see this from the very beginning. It's bizarre. Not to mention it's extremely long (2 hours 40 min). Unneccessarily long. I respect Spike Lee as a director but he should have cut half of those scenes out. The pace is just far too slow and you find yourself looking at the clock wondering when it will end. About 20 minutes from the end it is good and exciting for 10 minutes then it lapses into cheesy nonsense that makes me want to rip my hair out. Twilight is less cheesy than the last scene of this movie and Twilight is cheesy on purpose. My recommendation: do not rent. The trailer makes this movie look awesome, and awesome it is not. The dvd says something like it's the next best thing since Saving Private Ryan! But it's lying. So there you have it. I definitely think I should have my own movie review job where I write movie reviews for real people instead of how they do it now where critics write movie reviews for other critics and the audiences are like huh? Don't tell me how the juxtaposition between the cinematography and the intransient screenplay nonsense and just tell me it sucked and here's why. You're welcome internet. Sara |